<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "SYSTEM"
       "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="es">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">entropia</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Revista Entropía Educativa</journal-title>
                <abbrev-journal-title>Rev. Entropía Educ.</abbrev-journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2981-4723</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Entropía Educativa CI SAS</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <title-group>
                <article-title xml:lang="es">Del motor a la entropía: conectando formulaciones del segundo principio termodinámico a través del Triángulo de Johnstone</article-title>
                <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                    <trans-title>From motor to entropy: connecting formulations of the second thermodynamic principle through Johnstone&amp;#039;s Triangle</trans-title>
                </trans-title-group>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Alberto Rinaldi</surname>
                        <given-names>Carlos</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <aff>
                        <institution>CNEA / UNSAM</institution>
                    </aff>
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-2821-3123</contrib-id>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
                <day>21</day>
                <month>04</month>
                <year>2026</year>
            </pub-date>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <issue>6</issue>
            <abstract xml:lang="es">
                <p>El Segundo Principio de la Termodinámica es conceptualmente complejo e históricamente multifacético, constituyendo un desafío significativo en la educación científica. Este artículo emplea el Triángulo de Johnstone—un modelo que distingue niveles de representación macroscópico, microscópico y simbólico— como marco pedagógico para relacionar las tres interpretaciones fundamentales del Segundo Principio: los límites de eficiencia macroscópica de Carnot, la entropía estadística de Boltzmann, y la axiomatización formal de Carathéodory. Al alinear estas formulaciones con los niveles de Johnstone, proponemos una estrategia educativa comprehensiva para fomentar la comprensión conceptual profunda en termodinámica.</p>
            </abstract>
            <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                <p>The Second Thermodynamic Principle is conceptually complex and historically multifaceted, making it a challenge in science education. This paper employs Johnstone&amp;#039;s Triangle—a model distinguishing macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic levels of representation—as a pedagogical framework to relate the three foundational interpretations of the Second Principle: Carnot&amp;#039;s macroscopic efficiency limits, Boltzmann&amp;#039;s statistical entropy, and Carathéodory&amp;#039;s formal axiomatization. By aligning these formulations with Johnstone&amp;#039;s levels, we propose a comprehensive educational strategy for fostering deep conceptual understanding in thermodynamics.</p>
            </trans-abstract>
            <kwd-group xml:lang="es">
                <kwd>Segundo Principio Termodinámico</kwd>
                <kwd>Triángulo de Johnstone</kwd>
                <kwd>Carnot</kwd>
                <kwd>Boltzmann</kwd>
                <kwd>Carathéodory</kwd>
                <kwd>educación científica</kwd>
                <kwd>niveles de representación</kwd>
            </kwd-group>
            <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                <kwd>Second Thermodynamic Principle</kwd>
                <kwd>Johnstone&amp;#039;s Triangle</kwd>
                <kwd>Carnot</kwd>
                <kwd>Boltzmann</kwd>
                <kwd>Carathéodory</kwd>
                <kwd>science education</kwd>
                <kwd>representational levels</kwd>
            </kwd-group>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
        <ref-list>
            <ref id="B1">
                <mixed-citation>Duit, R., &amp;amp; Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B2">
                <mixed-citation>Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B3">
                <mixed-citation>Kesidou, S., &amp;amp; Duit, R. (1993). Students&amp;#039; conceptions of the Second Principle of thermodynamics—An interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300107</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B4">
                <mixed-citation>Kozma, R. B., &amp;amp; Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in Science Education (pp. 121–146). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_7</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B5">
                <mixed-citation>Leff, H. S. (2007). Entropy, its language, and interpretation. Foundations of Physics, 37(12), 1744–1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9163-3</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B6">
                <mixed-citation>Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., &amp;amp; Goedhart, M. (2021). The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: What do we know and where do we go from here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B7">
                <mixed-citation>Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., &amp;amp; Goedhart, M. (2022). Preservice physics teachers&amp;#039; development of physics identities: The role of multiple representations. Research in Science Education, 52, 1699–1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10019-5</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B8">
                <mixed-citation>Styer, D. F. (2000). Insight into entropy. American Journal of Physics, 68(12), 1090–1096. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1287353</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B9">
                <mixed-citation>Talanquer, V. (2011a). Learning chemistry: A matter of change. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 629–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003613394</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B10">
                <mixed-citation>Talanquer, V. (2011b). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry &amp;quot;triplet&amp;quot;. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179– https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="B11">
                <mixed-citation>Viennot, L. (1998). Experimental facts and ways of reasoning in thermodynamics: Learners&amp;#039; common approach. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1069–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200905</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
    </back>
</article>
